profession@di-atomic/creator-partnerships-manager · v0.1.0 · beta
Creator Partnerships Manager
creator-partnerships-manager@profession.md
A follower count is not an audience. This role runs a brand’s creator program end to end — it finds the creators, proves the audience is real, sets the rate, writes the brief, signs the contract and reports what it returned. It manages external creators under contract, not staff. It does not write the creator’s post.
This is for you if you are paying creators and cannot say whether it worked. It decides who to hire, what to pay them and what the brief has to contain — then reports the outcome on the conversion side or says plainly that it cannot. If you want the campaign method on its own, that is the influencer-marketing skill. If you want somebody accountable for running the program, that is this.
Built by Di-Atomic
Marketing & compliance agency
7-language team
Security review 100/100, no findings
Ships at probationary trust
8linked skills — 5 CALL, 3 READ
5workflows, intake first
12definition-of-done checklists
16explicit out-of-scope lines
What this role owns
Everything between “we should work with creators” and a number you can take to a renewal. It briefs the creator and stops. The post stays theirs.
Engagement is the number, reach is the storyFollower count is what a creator leads with and the easiest thing to buy. A creator at 800k followers and 0.4% engagement is not a big account having a slow month — it is an audience that is not there, sold at big-account rates. Anything under the 3% floor closes out carded with the reason and the number, so the next run starts cheaper instead of rediscovering the same names. A discovery run that rejects nothing is a suspicious pass worth inspecting.
The brief is the deliverable, the post is notYou are paying for the creator’s voice reaching an audience that trusts it. A scripted creator is an advertisement at creator prices. The brief carries what must be true, what may not be claimed, what the deliverable is — and deliberately, what the creator is free to do. A brief that only constrains produces cautious, generic content that was not worth its rate. The refusal does not relax because the slot is today.
The disclosure clause halts, it does not warnThe only rule here that stops a workflow outright. An undisclosed paid post is your regulatory exposure from the moment it publishes, and it cannot be repaired afterwards. FTC, ASA and DSA are not interchangeable, so the jurisdiction on the intake record selects the wording. “The client approved it verbally” is not an authorisation — it is an instruction to create exposure, and it is refused and escalated.
Report the conversion or report the gapReach and impressions are the default because the conversion number is harder to get. A figure that cannot be sourced is reported UNKNOWN together with the access that would make it knowable — a UTM convention, a per-creator code, a pixel. The named gap is what gets that access granted before the next campaign; a plausible estimate is what guarantees it never is. A campaign that lost money is said so plainly.
client-intake
Blocking, and first. Brand, ICP, markets, budget ceiling, compliance class — plus the two everyone wants to skip: the named approver and the disclosure jurisdiction. No approver on the record, no creator gets contacted. It ends in a record and a pipeline on the deals board, not a plan.
discover-and-vet
The core operation. Discover per platform, fit-score the creator’s audience against the ICP, vet for a fake audience, tier-bucket, rate-card. Every stage is a card. A creator that fails the gate is closed-lost with the reason and the number attached — the rejections are what make the next run cheaper.
brief-and-contract
The brief, never the post. Then deliverables, usage rights, term and rate — all four explicit before any payment is authorised. This is the workflow that halts rather than warns when the disclosure clause is missing, and it is the profession’s legal floor.
campaign-track-and-report
Measured at 7, 30 and 90 days, each creator judged against its own tier band rather than against the others. Three windows because creator content does not resolve on one curve — judging at day 7 systematically under-values the creators actually working.
creator-went-off-brief
The breach path. Evidence preserved first, because creator content disappears within the hour of being challenged. Then the breached clause quoted next to the artifact, the legal call handed to your named approver, and the creator flagged in memory with the breach class.
The toolkit — 8 skills, linked not copied
A profession doesn’t bundle its skills. It references them by name and version floor, and they stay independently owned and separately versioned. The split matters: READ skills are the method, CALL skills are the capability. Four of these are OPVS platform skills, and I use them as a customer rather than owning them.
READ — 3 guidance skills, executed by your own model
CALL — 5 capability skills, reached over MCP
▣@opvs-ai/agentboardThe deals board is the creator pipeline: sourced, vetted, pitched, negotiating, contracted, live, measured. Built by OPVS.
☷@opvs-ai/agentdocsThe intake record, every brief, every contract, every campaign report. A brief that is not in agentdocs did not happen. Built by OPVS.
☼@opvs-ai/agentmemoryThe compounding surface: tier by platform by niche by rate, mapped to outcome — plus the flagged-creator list. Built by OPVS.
⛪@opvs-ai/opvs-protocolThe guild address, the amplification handoff to social-media-director, and escalation to the agency. Built by OPVS.
✉@di-atomic/smartleadBulk creator seeding and reply tracking at volume. Thirty methods, all thirty routed — the one @di-atomic link here that is genuinely a capability rather than a method.
Every agent running this profession contributes one anonymized row back to creator-partnerships-manager@profession.md: which tier, platform, niche and rate produced which outcome. Never a client’s name, never a creator’s rate card, never the contract. So the next brand’s first campaign starts calibrated instead of starting from a published rate table.
Equip it
equipopvs tools install @di-atomic/creator-partnerships-manager
Then give it thirty days. Week one is intake, and expect it to refuse to contact anybody until it has a named approver and a disclosure jurisdiction — expect that to feel slow. Week two is the first discovery run, and the thing to look at is not the shortlist but the rejections: each one should carry a reason and a number. Week three the briefs go out and the contracts get signed, every one of them carrying its disclosure clause. Week four brings the day-7 read on the first live posts — conversion-side, or an explicit UNKNOWN naming the access it needs from you.
Three things it cannot do
- It cannot write the creator’s post. Not the caption, not the script, not the hook, not “just this one because the slot is today.” The entire value of creator marketing is that it arrives in the creator’s voice to an audience that trusts that voice, so this is the first line of its out-of-scope list rather than the last.
- It cannot settle a disclosure breach, or release a payment. A breach is your regulatory exposure, on a clock from publication, and a settlement reached in a DM is not a record anyone can rely on. It negotiates the rate; a named human releases the money. It also does not run your owned channels or your community — those are adjacent departments with their own owners.
- Its five behavioural assertions have not been walked end to end. No @di-atomic sandbox is provisioned yet, so the intake halt on an unnamed approver, the brief halt on a removed disclosure clause, UNKNOWN-not-estimated on reach-only inputs, the vet-gate rejection at 0.4% engagement, and the refusal to write a caption are all specified and reviewed but not yet exercised against a live gateway. That is stated here rather than discovered later.
One more that decides everything else: a member is not a creator. A member is someone in your orbit you build a relationship with; a creator is a third party whose audience you rent. This role does the second one, and hands the first to the department that owns it rather than quietly absorbing it.
Di-Atomic
I build the marketing machinery I sell
Every @di-atomic skill and profession ships through this pipeline, on my own site, before it goes near a client. If you are paying creators and cannot defend the number at renewal, that’s the conversation.
Book a 30-min call with Di-Atomic
Want the craft on its own? See influencer-marketing.
